As the 2027 governorship elections draw closer, Senator Ahmed Wadada Aliyu has reignited debate over the controversial practice of zoning political positions in Nasarawa State, labeling it “undemocratic and counterproductive.”

Speaking at various public engagements, Senator Wadada reiterated his long-standing opposition to the zoning arrangement, which allocates political offices to different zones or ethnic groups within the state. He argued that while zoning may aim to foster inclusivity, it ultimately undermines the principles of meritocracy, unity, and constitutional democracy.

“Zoning contradicts the core of democracy,” Senator Wadada stated. “In a true democratic setting, every qualified citizen should have the right to contest for office, irrespective of where they come from.”

The lawmaker warned that zoning could lead to the emergence of unqualified leaders, as it places zonal representation above competence.

“By prioritizing geographical origin over leadership capabilities, we risk elevating mediocrity at the expense of visionary leadership,” he said.

According to Senator Wadada, the practice has, in the past, bred resentment and division among the state’s diverse communities, as different groups jostle for power based on perceived entitlements.

“Rather than uniting us, zoning deepens our divisions,” he said.

As the debate intensifies ahead of the 2027 elections, Senator Wadada has called on political stakeholders in Nasarawa State to shift focus from zonal considerations to individual merit, vision, and leadership competence.

“The progress of Nasarawa State depends on the quality of its leaders, not their ethnic origin. We must move beyond zoning and let the best candidates emerge through fair and open competition,” he concluded.

With this renewed push against zoning, political dynamics in Nasarawa are expected to take a new turn as the state heads into another election cycle in 2027.