By Yakubu Dan Mukurna

The resignation of Barrister Mohammed H. Abdullahi from the All Progressives Congress (APC) did not come as a surprise to many observers, nor was it an act of heroism. Political alignments and realignments are, in fact, a normal feature of our political climate. However, Barrister Mohammed Abdullahi’s resignation deserves a more critical and nuanced reflection, especially within the context of Nigeria’s complex and often cynical political landscape.
First, as I noted earlier, political defections in Nigeria are nothing new. Shifting loyalties from opposition to ruling parties and vice versa are often driven more by personal interest than by ideology. In this light, Barrister Mohammed’s departure from the ruling party is not an act of “courage.” his resignation fails to provide a substantive framework to evaluate the reasons behind his decision beyond rhetorical personal reason
The key question is: What exactly were the ideological or policy differences that led to his resignation? Was this a long-standing internal struggle with the party’s direction, or merely a reaction to recent events? Without this context, framing the resignation as an act of pure principle risks oversimplifying what could just as well be a calculated repositioning in anticipation of future political opportunities.

Moreover, we must avoid romanticizing individual acts while ignoring competance and capability. Has Barrister Mohammed consistently stood on the side of principle through out his stay in the APC. Was he a vocal advocate for reform within the APC while still a member, or is this newfound “courage” only surfacing now that the political tide has shifted? These are fair and necessary questions to consider.
One important reality we must all understand is that one man’s exit does not restore faith in opposition politics.
The problem of the APC today is not new virtually all parties are suffering from same problem. Our problem is absence of viable alternative parties that offer coherent policy platforms and demonstrate greater institutional capacity. Our democracy requires structural strengthening, not personal grandstanding as Barrister Mohammed’s resignation appears to be.
If we are to move forward, political courage must go beyond resignations. It must translate into sustained advocacy for electoral reform, accountability, and transparent governance—regardless of party affiliation
The moral question now is: Where does Barrister Mohammed hide when he comes face to face with his  boss, Senator Tanko Al-Makura? His decision to exit the APC raises serious questions about Senator Al-makura’s standing in the APC. Was Barrister Mohammed resigned from APC with full knowledge of Senator Al-makura or the resignation purely act of betrayal?

Dan Mukurna contribute this piece from Sabon Gidan Bakin Kogi, Lafia LGA.